<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Chrome identifies itself as Safara 525.13?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.violinkid.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-identifies-itself-as-safara-52513/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.violinkid.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-identifies-itself-as-safara-52513/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke C</title>
		<link>http://www.violinkid.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-identifies-itself-as-safara-52513/comment-page-1/#comment-3608</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.violinkid.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-identifies-itself-as-safara-52513/#comment-3608</guid>
		<description>Chrome and Safari both use the Webkit framework. Chrome should show up as an older version of Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome and Safari both use the Webkit framework. Chrome should show up as an older version of Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hayesy</title>
		<link>http://www.violinkid.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-identifies-itself-as-safara-52513/comment-page-1/#comment-3470</link>
		<dc:creator>hayesy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.violinkid.com/2008/09/03/googles-chrome-identifies-itself-as-safara-52513/#comment-3470</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re both based on the same code, but I think its more likely to be a bug in your tracker than in the app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re both based on the same code, but I think its more likely to be a bug in your tracker than in the app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

